openwrt/package/boot/kobs-ng/patches/001-fix-mtd-defines.patch
Luka Perkov 1eb21b87bd kobs-ng: add new package
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov <luka@openwrt.org>

SVN-Revision: 37894
2013-09-03 23:22:16 +00:00

77 lines
1.9 KiB
Diff

From: Paul B. Henson <henson@acm.org>
Newer kernel headers renamed mtd mode defines and no longer support
MEMSETOOBSEL. Allow code to work with both older and newer kernel
versions.
Signed-off-by: Paul B. Henson <henson@acm.org>
---
http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/plain/package/kobs-ng/kobs-ng-fix-mtd-defines.patch
--- a/src/mtd.c
+++ b/src/mtd.c
@@ -852,8 +852,11 @@ void mtd_close(struct mtd_data *md)
mp = &md->part[i];
if (mp->fd != -1) {
+/* Newer kernels dropped MEMSETOOBSEL */
+#ifdef MEMSETOOBSEL
(void)ioctl(mp->fd, MEMSETOOBSEL,
&mp->old_oobinfo);
+#endif
close(mp->fd);
}
@@ -896,6 +899,8 @@ int mtd_set_ecc_mode(struct mtd_data *md
continue;
}
+/* Newer kernels dropped MEMSETOOBSEL */
+#ifdef MEMSETOOBSEL
if (r == -ENOTTY) {
r = ioctl(mp->fd, MEMSETOOBSEL, &mp->old_oobinfo);
if (r != 0) {
@@ -904,6 +909,7 @@ int mtd_set_ecc_mode(struct mtd_data *md
}
mp->oobinfochanged = 0;
}
+#endif
} else {
r = ioctl(mp->fd, MTDFILEMODE, (void *)MTD_MODE_RAW);
if (r != 0 && r != -ENOTTY) {
@@ -911,6 +917,8 @@ int mtd_set_ecc_mode(struct mtd_data *md
continue;
}
+/* Newer kernels dropped MEMSETOOBSEL */
+#ifdef MEMSETOOBSEL
if (r == -ENOTTY) {
r = ioctl(mp->fd, MEMSETOOBSEL, &none_oobinfo);
if (r != 0) {
@@ -920,6 +928,7 @@ int mtd_set_ecc_mode(struct mtd_data *md
mp->oobinfochanged = 1;
} else
mp->oobinfochanged = 2;
+#endif
}
mp->ecc = ecc;
--- a/src/mtd.h
+++ b/src/mtd.h
@@ -31,6 +31,14 @@
#include "BootControlBlocks.h"
#include "rom_nand_hamming_code_ecc.h"
+// Newer kernel headers renamed define
+#ifndef MTD_MODE_NORMAL
+#define MTD_MODE_NORMAL MTD_FILE_MODE_NORMAL
+#endif
+#ifndef MTD_MODE_RAW
+#define MTD_MODE_RAW MTD_FILE_MODE_RAW
+#endif
+
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Re-definitions of true and false, because the standard ones aren't good
// enough?